24
Dec
09

Thanks for a great 2009

Cheers!

10,000 hits and 400 comments on less than 120 total posts this year. They’re good numbers for the first year of this site. Thank you for reading. Thanks for your criticism. Thanks for the encouragement. I’ll pour myself a nice glass of scotch for all of you. You’ve all helped me kickstart this project, and it’s going to continue to be successful.

TPD had a very strong 2009, and I expect an even better 2010 – I’ll be moving to my own domain, and it’s my primary goal to have the book finished this year.

In the meantime, enjoy your holidays with families and friends (preferably, without the useless and ancient myths attached).

I’ll be back in January.

20
Dec
09

The best 9:40 you’ll spend all day

(unless you’re having sex or SMOKING)

(haven’t smoked in almost a month)

(I still miss it)

(convinced I write better while smoking)

*Ahem*

Anyway! I saw this over at Cleveland Freethinkers, and it’s totally worth sharing.

It’s something about actually seeing the arguments written out that make it much easier to understand, I think. I must be a more of a visual learner. Whenever someone tries to explain to me why they are religious, personal experience is the first thing that comes out. They have a mystical experience of answered prayer or completed prophecy that cannot be explained – so it must be God. As this video perfectly illustrates, this is a terrible fallacy (I cannot explain it, therefore, I can explain it). Personal experience isn’t proof.

13
Dec
09

‘The Anti-Christ’

“I simply cannot endure the way they have of rolling up their eyes. For the majority, happily enough, books are mere literature. Let us not be led astray: they say ‘judge not,’ and yet they condemn to hell whoever stands in their way. In letting God sit in judgement they judge themselves; in glorifying God they glorify themselves; in demanding that every one show the virtues which they themselves happen to be capable of – still more, which they must have in order to remain on top – they assume the grand air of men struggling for virtue, of men engaging in a war that virtue may prevail.

‘We live, we die, we sacrifice ourselves for the good (-’the truth,’ the light,’ ‘the kingdom of God’): in point of fact, they simply do what they cannot help doing. Forced, like hypocrites, to be sneaky, to hide in corners, to slink along in the shadows, they convert their necessity into a duty: it is on grounds of duty that they account for their lives of humility, and that humility becomes merely one more proof of their piety. Ah, that humble, chaste, charitable brand of fraud!

Friedrich Nietzsche – ‘The Anti-Christ’

Succinct, artful and completely devastating – this was Nietzsche (as some scholars argue) at his very best. ‘The Anti-Christ’ was the last book he wrote before his mental illness and subsequent death. His final shot against Christianity still clearly resonates in the modern day – he was, and still is, a timeless author. After working my way through this book this week, I am finding myself constantly inspired.

11
Dec
09

De-conversion?

How should atheists handle de-conversion?

It’s something of an unexpected side effect of my switch to atheism – while I mostly encountered criticism, in the last several months I’ve had more than five people contact me and claim that they too were close to leaving their faith.

It’s an awkward position for me. In my opinion, atheism is superior in every way to any religion – but I make a concerted effort not to turn my non-belief into a crusade. I don’t want to ‘de-vangelize’ anyone. In fact, this is one of the best things about atheism; I have no imperative to convert at all. A Christian is commanded to evangelize within their own Scripture. With each conversation, I simply stated that I didn’t proselytize. One of the basic elements of atheism is free-inquiry – and no one can ask these questions for you.

In my experience, most religious people, if they are looking to leave religion, will do so in the same way that they found it – by latching onto a charismatic person who will hold their hand during the whole daunting process. The herd mentality doesn’t die quickly or easily. In some of these conversations, I had the distinct impression that the individual wanted to put the gun in my hand – they wanted someone else to drive the death nail through their beliefs. I am not a killer of faith, but a proponent of intellect. I think confusing the two is the most common mistake atheists make when dealing with this situation.

One of the most effective questions I asked in these discussions was a fairly simple one: ‘Is Christianity sufficient in your own view?’ If they’re claiming that they’re ‘close’ to converting, in some way, it is insufficient to them. I let them air whatever grievance they may have, while maintaining a fair level of apathy. It’s a choice that needs to be reached on a personal level first, not a communal one, and the last thing I want to do is convey a conditional friendship – one that is contingent upon agreeing with me.

Concerning de-conversion, I am somewhat torn on two issues. First, as I can say from experience, leaving any religion is a difficult and lonely process at times. I really did not have anyone else who was a ‘mentor’ to me, so to speak, in my atheism. I often think my experience would have been easier if I had any like-minded friends alongside me.  Do atheists owe it to their questioning friends to provide a helpful and nurturing environment?  Secondly, I come back to the question I’m asked often – ‘Do you want people to stop going to church?’

Yes and no. I stand by my original assertion; atheism offers humanity true peace. There is no God to please, and no devil to fight with – no sin to atone for, and no penance to pay.  I’d like everyone I know to experience this kind of peace, but realistically, I know it cannot happen. Do I owe it to my friends to make that choice available to them? At what point do I become every bit the missionary that they are?

As it stands, I hold to my current position. As people continue to come to me for guidance,  I continue to put the burden of inquisition and action upon them. I don’t want to intrude upon the intellectual decisions of another – if someone invites me into that process, I should take it as a compliment, and proceed with respect and tolerance.

08
Dec
09

Is the Catholic Church is a force for good in the world?

Intelligence Squared is a great debate program (which I’m sorry I haven’t discovered sooner), and this installment asks if the Catholic Church is good for the world. Stephen Fry and Christopher Hitchens represent the ‘against’ side of the argument, while Archbishop John Onaiyekan and Anne Widdecombe argue for the motion.

My man-crush on Hitchens continues, as he mercilessly takes apart the non-sense, party-line bullshit rhetoric put forth from Widdecombe and Onaiyekan. He drops the hammer at the end of the first video, and the beginning of the second.

If you watched the very last video, you saw the ‘final score’, so to speak, as the people supporting the Catholic motion decreased by 410 people, while the ‘against’ argument gained 771 proponents. It really shows you how easily the religious rhetoric falls apart once free-inquiry and reason are applied to basic questions like this.




Proud Atheist

The Out Campaign: Scarlet Letter of Atheism
TPD is the blog that follows a twenty-something atheist author as he tries to finish his first book.

TPD on Twitter